- Ayodhya Verdict” goes LIVE Updates verdict after 70 years of a dispute the results are out.
On this iconic date
NOVEMBER 9, 2019
The most confusing and old decision is out after 70 years
Ayodhya Verdict Live Updates: The entire dispute s been in the favour of Hindus for the establishment of ram mandir the ram Janmabhoomi- as in favour of Babri Masjid they have been given an area of 5 acres land for their establishment of the mosque since the land has been in favour of the things a trust has been made for the mandir in the name of mandir to start the construction of the mandir
The trust will be formed in the time duration of three months and the trust will see to the matter that the temple has been constructed properly .the trust has been made with the helo of the government the central government
. The Sunni Wakf Board will be provided with 5 acres of alternate land
To announce and declare the division there was a sitting of, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court who has ruled unanimously for the verdict.
There has been a high alert security system and emergency yesterday night that is onn8th nov because of this Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi ruling. In the city Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh there is a massive crew of police force along with the political leaders and also our room minister Narender Modi has been present there.
Telling people to calm down and also to respect the verdict. The order has been passed by the Uttar Pradesh government for closure if all the schools and educational institution till Monday
Because there are cancer if chaos to burst out.
the constitution bench of the Supreme Court says that all kinds of beliefs equal for Constitution. “Constitution speaks through judges. Worship of inner courtyard continued by Hindus even when in possession,” the top court says.
For 325 years, from the construction of the mosque till 1857, Muslims have given no evidence of offering prayers at the disputed structure in exclusion of Hindus, it says. Destruction of the mosque in 1992 was in breach of SC order, says CJI-led bench.
But documents showed that before 1857, the Hindus were never barred from worshipping in the inner courtyard. The railings which segregate the outer and inner courtyard was established in 1857. But it is to the beliefs of Hindus that the birthplace of lord ram was situated in the inner courtyard of the mosque.
The SC has held that the ASI report that held that there was a pre-construction underlying that place
It was not held on assumptions but the Supreme Court followed the findings of ASI reports
As it is claimed by ASI. “Babri mosque wasn’t constructed on vacant land. An underlying structure did exist.”
The Ayodhya title suit verdict comes nine years after the 2:1 judgment of the Allahabad High Court that ordered a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acres of land between the three parties — Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara.
It was The Lucknow Bench of the High Court, on September 30, 2010, held that Hindus and Muslims as joint title holders of the disputed land.
The Allahabad High Court judgment ran into an excess of 6,000 pages. The High Court verdict was challenged in the Supreme Court, which ordered a stay on it on May 9, 2011.